![]() |
|
The mullahs’ dictatorship and those who have been lobbying and
justifying their hideous measures have once again resorted to
their old tactics: claiming realpolitik and political realism
only justifies appeasing the mullahs and attempting to win their
hearts.
The main argument is over a specific decision: choosing between a
firm policy against the mullahs as the Godfather of terrorism in
today’s world and supporting the Iranian people’s call for
democracy, or standing alongside the ruling dictatorship as
promoted by the regime’s lobbies and apologists.
Debate over Iran and policy vis-à-vis the Iranian regime has once
again become an urgent matter discussed especially in Washington.
The reason is clear: Despite all the illegitimate concessions
provided by the Obama administration to the theocracy ruling
Iran, not only has nothing changed regarding the mullahs’
actions, in fact they have become emboldened in regards to
domestic oppression, meddling in the Middle East, especially
Syria, and the production of weapons of mass destruction. It is
quite natural that the approach towards and an evaluation of the
main Iranian opposition, the People’s Mojahedin Organization of
Iran (PMOI/MEK), is at the heart of these discussions.
To read more on this Ling
http://bit.ly/2kgYUij
No comments:
Post a Comment